mouse monoclonal anti tlr4 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Mouse Monoclonal Anti Tlr4 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti tlr4 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Electroacupuncture alleviates pain by activating the MD2/TLR4/NF-κB pathway in the ST36 acupoint"
Article Title: Electroacupuncture alleviates pain by activating the MD2/TLR4/NF-κB pathway in the ST36 acupoint
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1626755
Figure Legend Snippet: EA-induced analgesia is associated with MD2, TLR4, and p-p65/p65 in the ST36 acupoint and MD2 and TLR4 interactions. (A) The experimental protocol timeline is illustrated, with the duration of each intervention clearly indicated in the figure. (B) The location of the ST36 acupoint in mice (up) and the swelling of paw comparison before (right) and after (left) CFA injection. (C) PTWTs were detected on the D-3 to D-1, D1pre, D1post, D3, D5, and D7 after interventions (n = 8), ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ※※ P < 0.01 vs. the SHAM. (D) The expression levels of PKC protein in the spinal cord were determined by WB (n = 3), ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ** P < 0.01 vs. the SHAM. (E, F) The expression levels of CX3CL1 (E) , IL-1β (F) in the spinal cord were determined by Elisa (n = 6), ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ** P < 0.01 vs. the SHAM. (G) Data sourced from https://cn.string-db.org/ . (H) Co-IP assay with TLR4 antibody (or IgG) in the ST36 acupoint, followed by WB analysis of MD2 and TLR4. (I–K) The expression levels of MD2 (I) , TLR4 (J) , and p-p65/p65 (K) were determined using WB analysis in the ST36 acupoint on D7 (n = 3), * P < 0.05 vs. the CON, ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ※※ P < 0.01 vs. the SHAM.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Injection, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: The effects of modulating MD2 in the ST36 acupoint on EA-induced analgesia and on the protein levels of MD2, TLR4, and p-p65/p65. (A) Lentivirus injection, behavioral testing, and acupoint stimulation experimental schedule. (B) Detection of lentivirus transduction in the ST36 acupoint by IF assay after MD2 knockdown lentivirus injection (n=3). (C) IF assay detection of lentivirus transduction in ST36 acupoint after overexpression lentivirus injection (n=3). (D) The transfection efficiency of the control lentivirus (FR-376) in ST36 acupoint (n=3). (E) The transfection efficiency of the control lentivirus (FV-115) in ST36 acupoint (n=3). (F) The expression of MD2 after injection of three different target knockdown lentiviruses were detected by WB (n=4). (G) The expression of MD2 after injection of overexpression was detected by WB (n=3). (H) The PTWTs were detected on D-3 to D-1, D1pre, D1post to D7 (every other day) (n = 6), ** P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+LVcon, # P < 0.05 vs. the AIA+LVcon+EA, ## P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+LVcon+EA. (I–K) The expression level of MD2 (I) , TLR4 (J) , and p-p65/p65 (K) (n = 3), ** P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+LVcon, # P < 0.05 vs. the AIA+LVcon+EA, ## P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+LVcon+EA. (L) PTWTs were detected on D-3 to D-1, D1pre, D1post to D7 (every other day) (n = 6), * P < 0.05 vs. the AIA+OEcon, ** P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+OEcon. (M–O) The expression level of MD2 (M) , TLR4 (N) , and p-p65/p65 (O) (n = 3), ** P < 0.01 vs. the AIA+OEcon.
Techniques Used: Injection, Transduction, Knockdown, Over Expression, Transfection, Control, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: EA treatment can increase the co-expression of MD2/TLR4, TLR4-Vimentin, TLR4-Tryptase, as well as TLR4-F4/80 at the ST36 acupoint. (A) Double-labeling immunofluorescence of TLR4 (green), MD2 (red) and DAPI (blue), scale bar = 20 µm. (B) Double-labeling immunofluorescence of TLR4 (green), fibroblasts (red) and DAPI (blue), scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Double-labeling immunofluorescence of TLR4 (green) and Tryptase (red), scale bar = 20µm. (D) Double-labeling immunofluorescence of TLR4 (green) and F4/80 (red), DAPI (blue), scale bar = 20µm. (E) Immunofluorescence quantitative analysis of MD2/TLR4 (n = 3), * P < 0.05 vs. the CON, ## P < 0.01 vs. the AIA. (F) Immunofluorescence quantitative analysis of TLR4-Vimentin (n = 3), ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ## P < 0.01 vs. the AIA. (G) Immunofluorescence quantitative analysis of TLR4-Tryptase (n = 3), # P < 0.05 vs. the AIA. (H) Immunofluorescence quantitative analysis of TLR4-F4/80 (n = 3).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Labeling, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: The pattern of the effect of EA treatment on MD2, TLR4 in ST36 acupoint. (A) Behavioral testing, acupoint stimulation and molecular detection experimental schedule. (B–D) PTWTs were detected on D1post (B) (n=8), D3 (C) (n=6), and D5 (D) (n=6), ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, ※ P < 0.05 vs. the SHAM, ※※ P < 0.01 vs. the SHAM. (E–H) The expression level of MD2 in the ST36 acupoint was determined by WB on D1post (E) , D3 (F) and D5 (G) (n = 3); the TLR4 was determined on the D5 (H) (n = 3), * P < 0.05 vs. the CON, ** P < 0.01 vs. the CON, # P < 0.05 vs. the AIA. ※ P < 0.05 vs. the SHAM.
Techniques Used: Expressing

![Nr-CWS affects MARCO expression through <t>TLR4.</t> The expression of TLR4 significantly increased after Nr-CWS treatment [ (D-G) , scale bars = 100 μm], while the expression TLR2 was unchanged (A-C) . Subsequent inhibition of TLR4 expression resulted in decreased levels of MARCO [ (H-J) , scale bars = 100 μm]. n = 3, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_6005/pmc12936005/pmc12936005__fimmu-17-1611476-g009.jpg)
